Before being elected to Congress in 2008, Representative Bill Foster of
Illinois, a Democrat, worked for more than 20 years as a physicist at
the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill. Now, as the only member of Congress with a Ph.D. in science, he says there is an
urgent need for more scientists in politics.
Does partisan politics limit your ability to raise scientific issues?
In a typical hearing of the House Committee on Science, Space, and
Technology or Financial Services Committee—both of which I am on—you
will get three Republican witnesses and a single Democrat. These
committee policies are largely at the discretion of the chairman. When
you look at simple reforms that would make [Congress] work in a more
bipartisan, fact-based way, just having an equal number of witnesses
from both sides would be a real step forward. I think it’s incumbent on
us, if the Democrats do take over again, that we go out of our way to
make sure the rules are not so winner-takes-all.
Politics is very different from science—in science, if you stand up and
say something that you know is not true, it is a career-ending move. It
used to be that way in politics. It has taken me a while to adjust to
politics where, for many who practice it, the question is not “Is it
true?” but “What can I convince the voting public is true?” That
psychology has bled into politics more than it should.
No comments:
Post a Comment